Originally posted by LaraofKrypton
It seems to me that since you hate Clark so much, you should stop watching, instead of ranting and raving about the "flaws" you hate so much. This forum is here to discuss things about the show, not bash. It's great that you have an opinion, but I think most of us don't share it. Anyway, it's not worth blowing a gasket over...it is just a show... *ducks for cover from flying objects*
It seems to me that since you hate Clark so much, you should stop watching, instead of ranting and raving about the "flaws" you hate so much. This forum is here to discuss things about the show, not bash. It's great that you have an opinion, but I think most of us don't share it. Anyway, it's not worth blowing a gasket over...it is just a show... *ducks for cover from flying objects*
Never the less, this is a great debate. Exercise your mind for a sec. This goes beyound the show, and reaches to our normal lives and the decisions we take. The show has had moments, but in all i think it could have been better ..the movie was a disaster. Batman return, and other movies did better.
All i am saying is that the way they portray this superhero wannabe, is not consistent with what a hero is supposed to do. Even at an early ages...we have seen that the flash has more potentials. Clark just really never initiate anything, rather HE REACTS. Even now we see chloe as the brain power behind him. I just cannot stand by and not say a thing or 2 about this.
Also just because i watch the show doesn't prevents me from having criticisms about the script and the job done. If you cannot excercise this we all better just be drones waiting to be mouth fed anything crap.
ps : no need to duck...grow up!
Originally posted by myankskent
[B]Hold on a second. When has Lex killed before? He has never killed anyone in cold blood on this show. He killed Roger Nixon, but that was because he was going to murder Clark's father.
[B]
And how do you know if the person that you are saving is going to kill again? And how do you know that the courts would let the person off for their crimes? Those are a lot of unknowns for a person to take matters into their own hands and decide if a person deserves to live or die.
So what would you like to see on this show? Do you want to see him let Lex Luthor die so that the show would end? I just don't understand what you want out of Clark.
[B]Hold on a second. When has Lex killed before? He has never killed anyone in cold blood on this show. He killed Roger Nixon, but that was because he was going to murder Clark's father.
[B]
And how do you know if the person that you are saving is going to kill again? And how do you know that the courts would let the person off for their crimes? Those are a lot of unknowns for a person to take matters into their own hands and decide if a person deserves to live or die.
So what would you like to see on this show? Do you want to see him let Lex Luthor die so that the show would end? I just don't understand what you want out of Clark.
You need to check your records, how many times did LEX leave people to DIE??????? Only for clark to come save them? Isn't that the same as Killing someone??? I won't even give you the many times this has happened, but do check and get back to me. The way he assaulted his friend in school..in aqua...ect..
Lex is nothing..i just do not understand what is the big deal. Ok let's say he is dead, why should the show end?? In fact i think this is something that has to happen soon. THere are many many villains out there far more powerful than Lex. It startles me the infatuations with this lil man. Move forward! Maybe the Kal El can begin to really grow.
I get the feeling that Lex is kept in the show to give Superman something to do. THAT IS MY PROBLEM WITH THE SHOW!! Batman has his own demons regardless of the Joker, 2face, and many others.
I would like to really focus on the inner inner struggles of Kal El independently of Annyone else. They've tried a bit in the episode while in the FZ and also when Raya visited him. But i just want to focus on the man of steel, not the man of steel defined by others around him.
Comment