Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 122
  1. #46
    Pirate King Backward Galaxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 03
    Location
    The Danger Zone
    Posts
    11,011
    I hated every second of that. Now, I'm depressed.

  2. #47
    Mod of Steel Vergon6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 07
    Location
    The Twilighty Zone
    Posts
    25,353
    I thought it was a decent promo but I really hope it's good and not them trying too hard to be gritty. Wish Mike Sussman was involved.

  3. #48
    Board Master Aries83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 07
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    2,635
    I didn't like it that much. Why didn't we see any footage of Jason Isaacs?

  4. #49
    Madman With A Blue Box Austin 3:16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 04
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,452
    Aries83 thats what i was wondering too.

  5. #50
    Stranger Than Reality! darkphoenix21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 07
    Location
    Where the road calls
    Posts
    87,904
    It finally has a release date. It will premiere on CBS and the streaming service on Sunday September 24th @ 8:30pm. The first two episodes will be available that Sunday on CBS All Access than there after new episodes will be released each Sunday only on the streaming service until it's November 5th season finale.

    http://tvline.com/2017/06/19/star-tr...bs-all-access/

  6. #51
    Stranger Than Reality! darkphoenix21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 07
    Location
    Where the road calls
    Posts
    87,904
    Commander William T. Riker (Jonathan Frakes) himself will be directing an episode of the upcoming season. Jonathan is not a stranger to directing episodes of Star Trek, having directed episodes of TNG, DS9 and Voyager.

    http://ew.com/tv/2017/06/27/star-tre...nathan-frakes/

  7. #52
    Stranger Than Reality! darkphoenix21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 07
    Location
    Where the road calls
    Posts
    87,904

  8. #53
    Mod of Steel Vergon6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 07
    Location
    The Twilighty Zone
    Posts
    25,353
    I really hope this is good but it is a bit troubling that they felt the need to tie Burnham to Sarek in such a strong way....

  9. #54
    Madman With A Blue Box Austin 3:16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 04
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,452
    I still would rather see this on the CBS network instead. I know they want to push the show to gain subs, but I don't think it's gonna work. Other places in the world get to see the show on Netflix but you have to pay extra money to see it here in the States? Sorry but I'm not going to shell out more money to watch a single show on CBS All Access.

    I'm really hoping when the series airs the entire first season, we see Netflix do with it what they do with the CW shows. Eight days after a season ends on The CW, the entire season goes to Netflix. I really hope that happens with thi she show.

    I don't think most Trek fans will pay for a subscription to All Access to just watch one show. Why they couldn't put it on the CBS channel who knows. I'm sorry but they could've easily used this show to plug a hole in the channel's lineup.

  10. #55
    Posting Pro Aurora Moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 14
    Posts
    1,473
    Quote Originally Posted by Austin 3:16 View Post
    I still would rather see this on the CBS network instead. I know they want to push the show to gain subs, but I don't think it's gonna work. Other places in the world get to see the show on Netflix but you have to pay extra money to see it here in the States? Sorry but I'm not going to shell out more money to watch a single show on CBS All Access.

    I'm really hoping when the series airs the entire first season, we see Netflix do with it what they do with the CW shows. Eight days after a season ends on The CW, the entire season goes to Netflix. I really hope that happens with thi she show.

    I don't think most Trek fans will pay for a subscription to All Access to just watch one show. Why they couldn't put it on the CBS channel who knows. I'm sorry but they could've easily used this show to plug a hole in the channel's lineup.
    Agreed.

  11. #56
    Board Master Aries83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 07
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    2,635
    Quote Originally Posted by Vergon6 View Post
    it is a bit troubling that they felt the need to tie Burnham to Sarek in such a strong way....
    Maybe they just wanted her to have a connection with Sarek because of his long history as a Star Trek character?

    A way to make her more important/relevant, I guess?

    It's no different than when Sarek melded with Picard (or when Picard melded with Spock). Then again, Picard didn't need help being relevant, but I know I enjoyed those Sarek/Spock episodes of TNG.

    I liked the "official" trailer more than the first look trailer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Austin 3:16 View Post
    I still would rather see this on the CBS network instead. I know they want to push the show to gain subs, but I don't think it's gonna work.
    I agree. Who knows, maybe All Access will bomb and they'll have no choice but to move it to the network?
    Last edited by Aries83; 09-13-2017 at 10:19 PM.

  12. #57
    Madman With A Blue Box Austin 3:16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 04
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,452
    Quote Originally Posted by Aries83 View Post
    Maybe they just wanted her to have a connection with Sarek because of his long history as a Star Trek character?

    A way to make her more important/relevant, I guess?

    It's no different than when Sarek melded with Picard (or when Picard melded with Spock). Then again, Picard didn't need help being relevant, but I know I enjoyed those Sarek/Spock episodes of TNG.

    I liked the "official" trailer more than the first look trailer.



    I agree. Who knows, maybe All Access will bomb and they'll have no choice but to move it to the network?
    Wouldn't surprise me if thats what happens. Especially since i just heard CBS is refusing to send out screeners and embargoing reviews. Thats not a good sign.

  13. #58
    Nate nate-dog1701d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 10
    Location
    Sector 2814
    Posts
    3,591
    I plan to wait until the end of the season and subscribe for one month. Seven or eight dollars to watch a show (with access to other things) isn't terrible if you don't have cable, but I can see how it would be frustrating if you already pay a ridiculous cable charge and don't get access to a major network show. Free would certainly be my preferred option.

  14. #59
    Pirate King Backward Galaxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 03
    Location
    The Danger Zone
    Posts
    11,011
    Quote Originally Posted by Austin 3:16 View Post
    Wouldn't surprise me if thats what happens. Especially since i just heard CBS is refusing to send out screeners and embargoing reviews. Thats not a good sign.
    Oh, boy. That's not good.

  15. #60
    Nate nate-dog1701d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 10
    Location
    Sector 2814
    Posts
    3,591
    Do review embargoes ever precede good reviews?

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •