Matt is right.For me the general structure of the season is unstable and that's what's causing these ratings.What is a viewer supposed to do when on one week he sees the LOS,Brainiac and Doomsday and the next week they are all gone?How is a viewer supposed to care about Tess when he sees her once every 3 or 4 episodes?Truth be told,Smallville raises it's ratings only through guest stars or new DC characters.That however is a weekly solution and doesn't help longterm.It's not Lana's fault or Lois' absence.Smallville had big ratings in the past with Lana present and with Lois absent.You know how?Same characters and same storylines every week.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TV Ratings for "Bulletproof"
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Let me ask this, if the rating is bad why did media week say this:
The CW capped off the evening with its combination of Smallville (#5: 2.5/ 4), which seems to have perked up in recent weeks, and the compatible Supernatural (#5: 2.1/ 3).
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_...1a63fd4a7a1649
What does that mean, sorry if I take their word over some of your posts!Comment
-
-
Let me ask this, if the rating is bad why did media week say this:
The CW capped off the evening with its combination of Smallville (#5: 2.5/ 4), which seems to have perked up in recent weeks, and the compatible Supernatural (#5: 2.1/ 3).
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_...1a63fd4a7a1649
What does that mean, sorry if I take their word over some of your posts!Comment
-
Let me ask this, if the rating is bad why did media week say this:
The CW capped off the evening with its combination of Smallville (#5: 2.5/ 4), which seems to have perked up in recent weeks, and the compatible Supernatural (#5: 2.1/ 3).
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_...1a63fd4a7a1649
^What does that mean, sorry but I'll take their word over some of your posts!Comment
-
I wouldn't trust what media week says. It took them weeks to come to the conclusion that the ratings on Smallville were starting to increase during the first run of episodes. They kept calling Smallville an aging show, like it wasn't doing well, even though it continually posted the best ratings out of all CW shows and actually competed with some of the garbage that FOX put out in the 8pm hour.Comment
-
They`ve got, what they deserved...Lana- Fu sucks...she always destroys the show, bringing her back and moreover without ED in the episode was A HUGE mistake!!!!Comment
-
-
Let me ask this, if the rating is bad why did media week say this:
The CW capped off the evening with its combination of Smallville (#5: 2.5/ 4), which seems to have perked up in recent weeks, and the compatible Supernatural (#5: 2.1/ 3).
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_...1a63fd4a7a1649
What does that mean, sorry if I take their word over some of your posts!Comment
-
I wouldn't trust what media week says. It took them weeks to come to the conclusion that the ratings on Smallville were starting to increase during the first run of episodes. They kept calling Smallville an aging show, like it wasn't doing well, even though it continually posted the best ratings out of all CW shows and actually competed with some of the garbage that FOX put out in the 8pm hour.
Nothing like TheWB, at least back then Smallville was going up against shows that were worth watching.
But if what you guys say that media week is wrong, then I'll wait for Craig's take on the ratings if he posts anything up.
I just hate seeing the blame being put on Lana/Clana even though the ratings for this season haven't been all that great to begin with and the ratings around this time always go down, been like that every season since season 1.Last edited by Kreukie; 01-23-2009, 10:03 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Who got the blame for Abyss?Comment
-
Comment