clarkbunny
03-21-2008, 04:56 PM
From what I understand of the episode
Lionel had been receiving mysterious letters for some weeks/months
These letters were either
1. As Lionel told Clark, threatening to harm/kidnap Clark
or
2. Threatening to expose Lionel's Veritas murders unless he handed Clark aka 'the traveller' over to Patricia
As a result of the last letter he decided to lock Clark up to give Patricia the impression when she came that he was going to hand him over to her when she brought the incriminating evidence. Thus allowing him to steal the evidence from Patricia while Clark would think he'd been kidnapped by the Government and would never know Lionel was responsible.
So basically Lionel used Clark as a pawn/bait in trying to cover up his previous underhand deeds. But his plan backfired on him due to the rogue employee torturing Clark which made him look much worse when he was exposed as the mastermind behind Clark's kidnapping and he didn't count on Chloe & Lana finding him out and using Kara to stage a rescue attempt thus exposing him to Clark.
I think Lionel lied to Clark at the end about trying to protect him due to the threatening letters 'cos he couldn't tell Clark that he had used him as a pawn to protect his shady past.
Not after Clark had been kidnapped, stunned with electro kryptonite guns and held hostage and tortured in a kryptonite cell for several hours.
Whether he came clean or lied he managed to lose Clark's trust by doing that and rightly so. From Clark's point of view how can he trust someone who is prepared to do that to him? He has good reason to question Lionel's motives.
I do wonder if there is more to those letters though and whether Patricia told Clark the whole truth??
Lionel had been receiving mysterious letters for some weeks/months
These letters were either
1. As Lionel told Clark, threatening to harm/kidnap Clark
or
2. Threatening to expose Lionel's Veritas murders unless he handed Clark aka 'the traveller' over to Patricia
As a result of the last letter he decided to lock Clark up to give Patricia the impression when she came that he was going to hand him over to her when she brought the incriminating evidence. Thus allowing him to steal the evidence from Patricia while Clark would think he'd been kidnapped by the Government and would never know Lionel was responsible.
So basically Lionel used Clark as a pawn/bait in trying to cover up his previous underhand deeds. But his plan backfired on him due to the rogue employee torturing Clark which made him look much worse when he was exposed as the mastermind behind Clark's kidnapping and he didn't count on Chloe & Lana finding him out and using Kara to stage a rescue attempt thus exposing him to Clark.
I think Lionel lied to Clark at the end about trying to protect him due to the threatening letters 'cos he couldn't tell Clark that he had used him as a pawn to protect his shady past.
Not after Clark had been kidnapped, stunned with electro kryptonite guns and held hostage and tortured in a kryptonite cell for several hours.
Whether he came clean or lied he managed to lose Clark's trust by doing that and rightly so. From Clark's point of view how can he trust someone who is prepared to do that to him? He has good reason to question Lionel's motives.
I do wonder if there is more to those letters though and whether Patricia told Clark the whole truth??