PDA

View Full Version : Regarding Angelus in Angel Season 4, hmm...



SSJConan
01-24-2008, 04:54 PM
I kinda got the feeling Season 4 of Angel severely toned down a certain demon alter-ego of Angel's. Anyone besides me notice this to a certain extent? I mean, here we have Angelus, the vampiric demon that lays dormant within the ensouled Angel/Liam; many considerable people have deemed him the most psychotic, cruel creature to ever exist (even Angel himself). Due to Cordelia/Higher-Being-to-be-known-as-Jasmine's insane and bizarre schemes to distract AI from her growing pregnancy, she decides to bring forth Angelus. Hence we get 5 episodes (not counting the very end of "Awakening") of the evil entity that terrorized Sunnydale worse than any other big bad in its time, whom now has two cities worth in southern California to tear through. But before I go further with my point, let's look back to Buffy the Vampire Slayer's second season, shall we?

Back when Angel was living in Sunnydale and achieved his "true, perfect moment of happiness" in Buffy's arms during her 17th birthday, he gradually-yet-swiftly was desouled and the demonic b*stard we know from the various flashbacks, Angelus, returned. With his return, he had the memories of Angel's past hundred years as a re-ensouled vampire. What does he decide to do? Attack everyone close to him that was held dear to his counterpart, most particularly the one element that made him feel like a human being again, Buffy Summers. He mentally and emotionally tortured the Slayer (as well as her friends in the process) in gearing her up for the moment he was ready to strike, evidently attempting to top even his "artistry accomplishment" of when he turned Drusilla.

Now, here's the thing. In Season 4 of Angel, this sense of mental and emotional torture, as well as the desire to attack those close to Angel, is retained. However, notice how back in Season 2 of Buffy, we got a great deal more of the mass murdering psychotic side of Angelus. I myself even did a count of all the people we know he killed before Willow re-ensouled him. As you can see:

"Innocence" ~ 2 (Smoking alley lady, Jenny Calander's Uncle)
"Phases" ~ 1 (Theresa Klusmeyer)
"Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered" ~ 1 (Shop-girl)
"Passion" ~ 2 (Nameless alley girl, Jenny Calander)
According to the First Evil in "Amends" ~ 4 (a Father and his three daughters)
"Becoming, Part One" ~ 2 (Museum Curator and nameless sacrificed guy)

12. Angelus killed 12 people, women and children freakin' included! A point that further emphasized how different an entity he truly was from Angel/Liam and the need for Buffy to kill him. Now, let's compare this insane carnage to what we see of ol' Angelus in his prime return in Angel's fourth season...oh wait, it's practically nonexistent! The toning down is really evident in these episodes, I mean hell, he never kills even one human (although I give the writers props for certainly making him trying to on some occasions). The worse the writers let him get away with was killing some demons (in the process doing Angel's job by killing the Beast), puncturing some shop-guy's lung, and draining Lilah's already-dead body. Although, I will admit that his emotional and mental taunting was certainly at its peek.

But my point mainly is, that's just the thing, his level of physical violence really seems to be extremely toned down. Which frankly, I don't understand, especially considering how much more emphasizing the Angel series was on distincting Angel and Angelus as separate entities (whereas in Buffy, the line was a bit hard to tell at times). Also, Angelus' interest in Buffy and Sunnydale seemed to be toned down just as much (a bit odd considering Angel acknowledged she was still his key to perfect happiness at the end of his fantasy), simply acknowledging the Slayer for being quite "a pistol". One would think he might've gone straight to Sunnydale after escaping, although considering LA was in a literal blackout and he had "friends" to take care of, I can understand him staying (though after the sun is restored, him going straight to a bar for drinks rather than Sunnydale once again irks me).

One thing I did like though was his reaction to hearing "the Slayer's in town", Angelus was straight-up pleased that he may have a chance to get a crack at Buffy. This allowed him to make a phone call to Buffy's place, something I again liked since it was one of the first things he did after escaping. And even though he ultimately learned it was Faith who'd came to LA, he nonetheless was pleased with the possibility of his "ex" returning.

But yeah. My point remains, violence with Angelus in Season 4 was severely toned down. Maybe the writers felt that if he went on another killing spree, the fans and they themselves would want Angel to be punished like he was in Acathla's hell dimension? Not sure. But hell, in the long run, the Angelus of Buffy Season 2 just seems to be FAR more menacing than the wisecracking, mentally-and-emotionally torturing purist we have in Angel Season 4. But heck, this entire post was pretty much me rambling (sorry ^^; ), hopefully I didn't waste anyone's time. If any of ya' agree or disagree, don't be a stranger and say what you think of the matter.

vyperman7
01-25-2008, 01:22 PM
My guess is that it was done so that the focus wouldn't be completely on Angelus. I agree that he was not nearly as violent as he was portrayed on Buffy. But Angelus in ATS was just supposed to be used as a plot device to help further the arc with The Beast. If you have Angelus out mudering people, it puts all the attention on him and takes attention away from the storyline at hand. That would be my main guess as to why they did it. In S2, there supposed to be a lot of focus on Angelus and the terror he caused because the relationship/battle between him and Buffy was the main focus of the season. But in ATS, Angelus was merely a subplot.

SSJ,

I also wanted to add that it felt like the beginning of your post was missing something. You start out your post by saying "Anyone besides me notice this to a certain extent". Yet you never say what we are supposed to be noticing. I had to read further into your post to see the point you were making. You might want to go back and add this at the very beginning to start- "In S4 of Angel, Angelus seemed to be toned down" or something along those lines so people know what you are talking about right off the bat...

SSJConan
01-25-2008, 06:44 PM
SSJ,

I also wanted to add that it felt like the beginning of your post was missing something. You start out your post by saying "Anyone besides me notice this to a certain extent". Yet you never say what we are supposed to be noticing. I had to read further into your post to see the point you were making. You might want to go back and add this at the very beginning to start- "In S4 of Angel, Angelus seemed to be toned down" or something along those lines so people know what you are talking about right off the bat...


My mistake, must've missed it when copy-pasting after I spell-checked. Fixed.

vyperman7
01-25-2008, 08:37 PM
I figured that was the case man. Just weirded me out the first time I read it..LOL

Pesk
01-26-2008, 05:17 PM
I just assumed angelus wasn't out killing because there was no one left to kill. The sun had been gone for a while and the vamps had already killed everyone who hadn't run away.

I haven't watched s4 in a while but I seem to remember one scene where he picks up some girl ready to bite her, then realises she's already a vampire, and he says something like 'aren't there any humans left'?

cayayofm
02-01-2008, 06:02 PM
For me the writers chicken out. First, I think that bringing Angelus into the show was something that they really wanted to do since the beginning. I mean is too good for it to not happen. So in season 2 they push Angel to the darkest place they can without him losing his soul and conscience. In season 4 they really got around to bring him, but I truly feel like they were afraid to push him too far because maybe they were afraid people will look different at their hero. Angel killing people will go against the image of a hero and savior of the innocent that they had constructed for 4 years. “Angelus” did not kill anyone during those episodes because Angel is the protector of the innocent. Angel is character searching for redemption, at the end of season one the writers introduced the prophecy that will turn Angel into a human and they made that the goal for Angel. Angelus killing people will have taken that possibility away and the progress that they had done to that point disappear in the eyes of the viewer. A person that we see kill and kill again does not deserve redemption and I really think the writers felt that they would have taken Angels progressions to that point disappear.

Hopefulsuicide
04-01-2008, 07:58 PM
I think, since it was already established how evil he was that it wasn't all that neccesary to have him drain a few people on screen.

plus no one is mentioning the two major points

1) he was in a cage most of the time, not exactly many people to kill in there
2) when he got out he was a little distracted by the voice in his head!

if he were just normal Angelus, free and without distraction he's be killing people left right and centre

but Angelus was never all about the kill anyway. it was always portrayed that Spike was the violent one, and Angel was the artistic one... yeah he did still kill for food sometimes, but the focus was always on the damage done by him being such a psycho

some of the people he killed in season 2 was for a purpose to screw buffy up more

1. theresa was in buffy's class as he found out when he walked with her
2. Jenny was complete art... it was just Angelus at his best

also, he was free, had a gang of dru and spike and their crew, didn't have a permenant eclipse making the human count lower than usual, and didnt have a bloody voice in his head!

i never found Angelus dissapointing in season 4... he was still wonderful

Dannyblue1
04-03-2008, 02:55 PM
Plus, I very much doubt Angelus didn't kill anyone during his days of freedom, even if we didn't see it. I don't have to see a lion down a zebra to know that's what it was probably doing yesterday.

But, as someone else said, the focus wasn't really Angelus this time around. Over on BtVS, Angelus messing with Buffy was pretty much the focus and they had to show Angelus doing a lot of bad things so we could see Buffy angsting over it. Angelus was also the Big Bad of the season, so the Scoobs didn't have a lot else to worry about. On AtS, they had the Beast out there slaughtering people, and the Beast Master (nobody knew who it was) preparing to do who knows what (but they knew it was gonna be majorly bad), and eternal midnight which was spreading and would soon cover the world meaning vamps and other demons would be free to wreak havok everywhere 24/7, and fire raining from the sky, and everything else that was happening. As weird as it sounds, Angelus was pretty far down on their list of problems and concerns.

cayayofm
04-04-2008, 02:30 PM
The thing is that this supports my thoughts. We needed to see Angelus kill if they wanted for us to think that he was killing, but we never saw it. Because they were very carefull to not disrupt the image of Angel and the good he has done. Instead Angelus did more good than evil. He was the one that told the gang that the Beast had Master and he later Killed the Beast, we got Angelus pretending to have killed Lilah instead of showing us he actually killing someone.

Vergon6
04-12-2008, 01:05 AM
I think, since it was already established how evil he was that it wasn't all that neccesary to have him drain a few people on screen.

plus no one is mentioning the two major points

1) he was in a cage most of the time, not exactly many people to kill in there
2) when he got out he was a little distracted by the voice in his head!

if he were just normal Angelus, free and without distraction he's be killing people left right and centre

but Angelus was never all about the kill anyway. it was always portrayed that Spike was the violent one, and Angel was the artistic one... yeah he did still kill for food sometimes, but the focus was always on the damage done by him being such a psycho

some of the people he killed in season 2 was for a purpose to screw buffy up more

1. theresa was in buffy's class as he found out when he walked with her
2. Jenny was complete art... it was just Angelus at his best

also, he was free, had a gang of dru and spike and their crew, didn't have a permenant eclipse making the human count lower than usual, and didnt have a bloody voice in his head!

i never found Angelus dissapointing in season 4... he was still wonderful
Exactly. That annoying voice aka Jasmine who constantly calling him "My sweet boy", kind of distracting. Plus as you point there was not many people kill. Angelus commented on how there didn't seem to be anyone left to eat when he was going to go after a girl but then saw she was a vampire already.

I got the sense that most people probably stayed in their homes during permanent midnight as much as they could. And since vampires have to be invited in, Angelus couldn't just waltz in, and I doubt anybody would want to open up their doors during that period.