View Full Version : What did I tell you! Jimmy was a jerk!
RamonaE
09-28-2006, 06:38 PM
Jimmy never called. I was so tired of everyone saying how nice of a guy Jimmy was supposed to be and how it was time that Chloe got a nice boyfriend....
Jimmy never called! LOL :p
AndyBear1980
09-28-2006, 06:38 PM
Although it was rather funny how he responded to Chloe shooting at him. LOL
MidgardDragon
09-28-2006, 06:40 PM
I think that comment can once and for all completely put to rest the "it wasn't Jimmy Olsen that she slept with" debate, too. Finally!
RamonaE
09-28-2006, 07:39 PM
I'm so glad, we got some explanation about how Jimmy & Chloe parted company.
I don't think Jimmy is going to be the knight in shining armor everyone expected.
Nospam
09-28-2006, 07:40 PM
The comment was meant to be funny, and it was, but if you put his comment in context with the spoilers that say that neither Chloe nor Jimmy thought the other was interested then he doesn't come off as a jerk. As I guy I've done that a million times to girls I just felt weren't that interested. Then again, maybe I am a jerk. :(
thehenry89
09-28-2006, 07:40 PM
jimmy's not a jerk he's just an idiot
jimmyolsenblues
09-28-2006, 07:47 PM
jimmy was no jerk. he likes chloe , no harm in that , chloe needs someone to love her back. not calling though was bad.
F-Stop Blues
09-28-2006, 07:48 PM
We dont know what happened. Maybe it will be referenced again.
angelfire east
09-28-2006, 07:50 PM
I don't think he's a jerk becuase of that one line. Yeah he never called but did she?
I agree with Nospam about with being taken context with the spoilers it works that he's not a jerk.
RamonaE
09-28-2006, 07:51 PM
Sorry. I'm a girl and any guy who doesn't call me after we're intimate is a jerk...
P.E.R.I.O.D :-)
Coyote
09-28-2006, 07:52 PM
I think Jimmy and Chloe were kinda cute together.
Nospam
09-28-2006, 07:56 PM
Originally posted by RamonaE
Sorry. I'm a girl and any guy who doesn't call me after we're intimate is a jerk...
P.E.R.I.O.D :-)
Yeah, if they were intimate then that's a different story. If it was just a date, well ain't no thang. If "James" did sleep with Chloe and then didn't call her again, well, he was a jerk. Although I don't try and sleep with someone I am not even sure likes me yet.
RamonaE
09-28-2006, 07:57 PM
I think they were cute and I'm sure Jimmy will be redeemed.
But I just think it's funny how everyone was like, "oh I'm so glad Chole's going to get a nice boyfriend."
He didn't call! I'm sure everything will be explained but I think it's funny.
heatvision=CK+CS
09-28-2006, 07:57 PM
I tihnk he's a jerk too:lol: same thing what I thought:lol:
I dont like him personly:lol: I was ewwing when ever I saw him, I stoped the ewww when either clark or chloe started talking but inbetween I was ewwwing when ever I saw his face:mad: He's a meany, you dont, DO NOT not call chloe back, he's crazy, he's been snappin crazy picturs, he's been eating crazy wafters, he's just been crazy...and defently NOT crazy cool...He's just crazy and jerky...Dont like him so far, what a way to bring in a new guy, "I didnt call you:D wanna get back together, I'll just stand right under this shakky and old butt tv so you can push me out of the way all the way across the room:D" I dont like his smilie either:mad: he got in the way of my chlark, and my momma didnt rase no fool, I'm protesting!:eek:
RamonaE
09-28-2006, 07:57 PM
Originally posted by Nospam
Yeah, if they were intimate then that's a different story. If it was just a date, well ain't no thang. If "James" did sleep with Chloe and then didn't call her again, well, he was a jerk. Although I don't try and sleep with someone I am not even sure likes me yet.
He took her virginity. That equals double jerk! :)
FiveForFighting09
09-28-2006, 07:58 PM
yeah....it would have been so funny if Chloe would have just raised the gun at him....i would have loved to see the look on Jimmy's face....
heatvision=CK+CS
09-28-2006, 07:59 PM
Ugh!!!!:eek::eek: Totaly^^^^^^^:(:(
Nospam
09-28-2006, 08:03 PM
Originally posted by FiveForFighting09
yeah....it would have been so funny if Chloe would have just raised the gun at him....i would have loved to see the look on Jimmy's face....
Well, Chloe's angst may certainly have played out better if after shooting at Jimmy she shouted, "You took my virginity and never called back, you bastard!"
Anyway, it certainly looks like this Jimmy is the one that pulled the petals off our fair Chloe and didn't have the decency to call her and see if she wanted another go around.
heatvision=CK+CS
09-28-2006, 08:04 PM
Ugh:mad::mad: You totaly said it:(...I dont like jimmy so far at all:(
FiveForFighting09
09-28-2006, 08:04 PM
yep...chloe would have shot him and then be all like ''whoops''.......
RamonaE
09-28-2006, 08:17 PM
Originally posted by Nospam
Well, Chloe's angst may certainly have played out better if after shooting at Jimmy she shouted, "You took my virginity and never called back, you bastard!"
Anyway, it certainly looks like this Jimmy is the one that pulled the petals off our fair Chloe and didn't have the decency to call her and see if she wanted another go around.
Exactly, that's what I've been saying. I'm sorry but if someone took my viriginity I would at least want a phone call. That would crush me. Call me old fashioned.
Nospam
09-28-2006, 08:18 PM
Originally posted by FiveForFighting09
yep...chloe would have shot him and then be all like ''whoops''.......
:)
Totally! Then she could run up to him and say, "Oh, Jimmy! I am so sorry! Oh my god, I shot you in the groin! How did that happen? It hurts a lot, huh? Sort of like the pain someone would feel if they just gave their most intimate gift to a rotten bastard that never called back, right?"
angelfire east
09-28-2006, 08:18 PM
Chloe seemed pretty hapy to see him, I saw no angst about not getting called back. Of course it could have been "this is the time of this angst, somethign big is happening" but afterwards I still saw no angst with Chloe. So I'm good with things for now.
AndiGirl
09-28-2006, 09:47 PM
I thought that too when he said it! haha...like "shoot him Chloe!" haha. I thought it was a funny thing to say at the time, but he slept with her...her first and only time, and doesn't call? Thats pretty bad. I was always under the impression Chloe dumped him.
sstray72
09-28-2006, 09:55 PM
I took the the "never called back" line as a joke since Chloe's face brightened up when she saw him. If it was the truth she probably WOULD'VE shot him!! :lol:
Oh and NoSpam, how many times have I told you that I LOVE your avatar? :D
gj430
09-28-2006, 10:06 PM
who's to say that they didn't talk after they slept together but he just didn't call after that. It didn't seem like Chloe was too broken up about it in s4 or in Zod.
svsabbiesv
09-28-2006, 10:07 PM
that was hilarious!!!!!!! haha classic! i loved it
confuzedmike84
09-28-2006, 10:10 PM
OMG that was hilarious..
I just think it was a bad to intro him into smallville.
Nospam
09-29-2006, 03:16 AM
Originally posted by sstray72
I took the the "never called back" line as a joke since Chloe's face brightened up when she saw him. If it was the truth she probably WOULD'VE shot him!! :lol:
Oh and NoSpam, how many times have I told you that I LOVE your avatar? :D
Oh, go on! Thanks! I love the addition of the King to yours!
Jimmy looks like a douche
RamonaE
09-29-2006, 10:38 PM
Originally posted by Ares
Jimmy looks like a douche
Agreed.
InLove_with_Chloe
09-30-2006, 12:04 AM
Originally posted by Ares
Jimmy looks like a douche
I was somewhat disappointed.
I expected more from him...
That must have been one hot-summer-night with Jimmy, otherwise: why would have Chloe forgotten CK so easily?
smallville_fetish
09-30-2006, 12:13 AM
Yeah at first I was surprised at how much Chloe quickly dropped everything when Jimmy simply asked her our for lunch. Is she usually easily flattered? Chloe never striked me as the 'easy' type.
RedDwarfette
09-30-2006, 04:43 AM
I doubt Jimmy was that good considering Chloe never spent time mooning over him after she returned to Smallville - she reserved that for Clark. Her quick acceptance of Jimmy's invite seemed more like a defence mechanism against Clark but then again... Either way Jimmy's actions [or lack of] seem pretty jerkish. Even if he thought she wasn't interested in him, wouldn't he call just once to see how Chloe was going? Lame.
shy175223
09-30-2006, 07:46 AM
Originally posted by RedDwarfette
I doubt Jimmy was that good considering Chloe never spent time mooning over him after she returned to Smallville - she reserved that for Clark. Her quick acceptance of Jimmy's invite seemed more like a defence mechanism against Clark but then again... Either way Jimmy's actions [or lack of] seem pretty jerkish. Even if he thought she wasn't interested in him, wouldn't he call just once to see how Chloe was going? Lame.
uhh I do recall that Chloe said in 'unSafe' that she actually thought it WAS love, but she commented at time that it was a summer fling. I do agree however, that the comment 'I never called you ,back' line WAS probably a joke since Chloe WAS very HAPPY to see him and not ready to kill him.
RamonaE
09-30-2006, 09:59 AM
Originally posted by shy175223
uhh I do recall that Chloe said in 'unSafe' that she actually thought it WAS love, but she commented at time that it was a summer fling. I do agree however, that the comment 'I never called you ,back' line WAS probably a joke since Chloe WAS very HAPPY to see him and not ready to kill him.
I think he actually did not call. It may have been a summer fling b/c "he did not call." I think the writers have made that clear.
If you take a girl's virginity and don't call, we all know what that would make you. I can speak for myself though and say that I would think he was an a*hole.
I remember saying months ago, that before we jump to the conclusion that Jimmy was such a great guy, lets see what actually happened. I specifically remember people saying that, "it's going to be so great that Chloe get's a guy who actually cares about her." So not true. Jimmy was a pig.
But that doesn't mean I won't give him a chance to redeem himself.
MBCorp
09-30-2006, 10:04 AM
Let's hope we get some sort of explanation about it because it does indeed make Jimmy look sort of assholish that he didn't call her back. However I am willing to give him a chance. And Chloe seemed pretty happy to see him anyway.
Liriel
09-30-2006, 10:08 AM
I thought of him saying he didn't call as more of a joke. Since they both seemed happy to see each other and he didn't seem to think she'd be upset with him.
It just didn't seem serious or like he actually thought she had any reaason to be upset.
RamonaE
09-30-2006, 10:11 AM
Originally posted by Liriel
I thought of him saying he didn't call as more of a joke. Since they both seemed happy to see each other and he didn't seem to think she'd be upset with him.
It just didn't seem serious or like he actually thought she had any reaason to be upset.
Well it was also a few years ago. There have been guys who I've liked who weren't the nicest people to me and after a few years, I wasn't upset any more. I was over it. And I suppose it wouldn't be all that serious if the world was almost ending?
Originally posted by MBCorp
Let's hope we get some sort of explanation about it because it does indeed make Jimmy look sort of assholish that he didn't call her back. However I am willing to give him a chance. And Chloe seemed pretty happy to see him anyway.
I agree. I'm willing to wait and see. I was just commenting on how there were so many assumptions about how great he was before he came on the show?
All about Clark
09-30-2006, 10:22 AM
I have to agree with RamonaE here, we're just not sure he is a great guy for Chloe. Something tells me that Clark would be there for her always and that just may not be the way Jimmy is. Something tells me they will have summer fling #2 and that's it.
shy175223
09-30-2006, 10:39 AM
Originally posted by Liriel
I thought of him saying he didn't call as more of a joke. Since they both seemed happy to see each other and he didn't seem to think she'd be upset with him.
It just didn't seem serious or like he actually thought she had any reaason to be upset.
exactly, and also according to the spoilers the reason why thye never pursued the relationship is because one thought the other wasn't interested at all. And yea, I think nOW the joke about not calling WAS sort of a joke otherwise she Chloe would not have been soo happy to see him.
Liriel
09-30-2006, 10:40 AM
Originally posted by RamonaE
Well it was also a few years ago. There have been guys who I've liked who weren't the nicest people to me and after a few years, I wasn't upset any more. I was over it.
I just didn't get that vibe. He was smiling and so was she and he didn't seem to think there was anything that might make her upset with him. It just seemed like they'd had a pleasant parting.
I think at worst both indicated they'd call after they got back home and then neither did.
shy175223
09-30-2006, 10:42 AM
Originally posted by All about Clark
I have to agree with RamonaE here, we're just not sure he is a great guy for Chloe. Something tells me that Clark would be there for her always and that just may not be the way Jimmy is. Something tells me they will have summer fling #2 and that's it.
yes, and Clark hasn't been really apperiacte of her and despite what happened in Zod which i interepet the scene VERY differnetly there , I still feel that he could never feel the sameway about her, and apparenly SHE knows that.
sari_chem
09-30-2006, 10:43 AM
If I were Chloe, I would be mad at Jimmy (from the facts that we were given in this episode). I mean he takes her virginity and then doesn't call her back? Geez.
But we have the rest of the season to see how Jimmy will be redeemed.
(btw, I still think it's weird that Jimmy is around the same age as Clark).
chlarkfan333
09-30-2006, 10:49 AM
Here's how I think they may explain it. Jimmy may not have called her b/c he thought Chloe regreted what happened and would rather not be reminded of it and/or b/c he was aware that her reasons for doing it were related to unrequited love for another guy.
JasonsLea
09-30-2006, 11:43 AM
Originally posted by thehenry89
jimmy's not a jerk he's just an idiot
:rotfl:
All about Clark
09-30-2006, 11:57 AM
Originally posted by chlarkfan333
Here's how I think they may explain it. Jimmy may not have called her b/c he thought Chloe regreted what happened and would rather not be reminded of it and/or b/c he was aware that her reasons for doing it were related to unrequited love for another guy.
Your thoughts make more sense than mine, I just assumed he lost her phone number. hehe
D.M.A.
09-30-2006, 11:57 AM
Originally posted by chlarkfan333
Here's how I think they may explain it. Jimmy may not have called her b/c he thought Chloe regreted what happened and would rather not be reminded of it and/or b/c he was aware that her reasons for doing it were related to unrequited love for another guy.
I thought that too,that maybe he thought she regretted it,and that he probably knew she was in luv wit sumone else when she did it.So maybe he felt bad already that he took her virginity,who knows.But it obviously didn't fase her when she saw him...I still don't think she's moved on yet but I do give jimmy the benefit of the doubt about not callin,because of the timin when they slept together.Plus it was also tptb screwup cause at first she made it up then 2 seasons later it happen and she regret it.So I don't blame jimmy fo real,just the writers :rolleyes:
shy175223
09-30-2006, 01:25 PM
Originally posted by chlarkfan333
Here's how I think they may explain it. Jimmy may not have called her b/c he thought Chloe regreted what happened and would rather not be reminded of it and/or b/c he was aware that her reasons for doing it were related to unrequited love for another guy.
I still think the 'didn't call' statement was implied as a joke otherwise she wound'nt have been soo glad to see him. But this one can make sense.
Originally posted by sari_chem
If I were Chloe, I would be mad at Jimmy (from the facts that we were given in this episode). I mean he takes her virginity and then doesn't call her back? Geez.
Yeah it still could be applied as a joke. If it was't so would Chloe been sooo happy to see.
I am the Superman
09-30-2006, 02:22 PM
I dont think hes a jerk, i just thought he felt threatened by clarks presence. Who wouldnt be.
RamonaE
09-30-2006, 02:26 PM
Originally posted by Liriel
I just didn't get that vibe. He was smiling and so was she and he didn't seem to think there was anything that might make her upset with him. It just seemed like they'd had a pleasant parting.
I think at worst both indicated they'd call after they got back home and then neither did.
Oh, I seriously doubt Chloe would allow someone to take her virginity and say, "oh, let's call each other when we both get home." And then it just happened to have ended pleasantly. Chloe told Lana that she thought it was love. I'm sorry but I don't think Chloe would just forget to call someone when "she thought it was love." I'm sure she would have tried if he was open to it. Which I don't think he was (at that time). Perhaps he's different now.
And secondly we have all had situations in which a person "dumped" us (or if you prefer a different term--"didn't call back") and we wanted to run into them again, to "show them," how they missed out (in a nice way).
And there's also the situation in which, it's the end of the world. The person you lost your virginity to is standing in front of you. Yeah, he didn't call but you're still glad to see him. Hey, it's the end of the world?
My point is, we don't know. We can't sing his praises until we know the full story, which I'm sure they'll explain.
Originally posted by I am the Superman
I dont think hes a jerk, i just thought he felt threatened by clarks presence. Who wouldnt be.
We're not talking about when he was in Clark's presence. Please read the 1st post. It explains what the thread is about.
Originally posted by chlarkfan333
Here's how I think they may explain it. Jimmy may not have called her b/c he thought Chloe regreted what happened and would rather not be reminded of it and/or b/c he was aware that her reasons for doing it were related to unrequited love for another guy.
Totally possible.
chlarkfan333
09-30-2006, 03:36 PM
Originally posted by shy175223
I still think the 'didn't call' statement was implied as a joke otherwise she wound'nt have been soo glad to see him. But this one can make sense.
Actually, I am in complete agreement that the statement was intended as a joke, but I don't doubt its veracity. So, now, the writers have left themselves in a position of having to explain why Chloe should care about a guy who was her first but who didn't call her back. In fact, I think this is exactly what might have happened with the whole Chlimmy thing to begin with. I'm willing to bet that they just threw in that bow-tie/DP reference in season 2 for effect and later on had to deal with its implications.
RamonaE
09-30-2006, 04:45 PM
I definitely want to see how they handle the situation.
Billy Jor-El
09-30-2006, 04:54 PM
Gee, Chloe could have responded to the "...sorry I never called" line with something like...
"Too bad; your doctor could have given you the cure in time." :D
Jimmy's a dolt for being with such a beautiful woman and then never calling. Damn, I'd have MIND MELDED with her :)
RamonaE
09-30-2006, 04:58 PM
Originally posted by Billy Jor-El
Gee, Chloe could have responded to the "...sorry I never called" line with something like...
"Too bad; your doctor could have given you the cure in time." :D
Jimmy's a dolt for being with such a beautiful woman and then never calling. Damn, I'd have MIND MELDED with her :)
Agreed. Jimmy will apologize and say it was b/c he was insecure about Clark and then tell her he made a mistake. It works every time. Girls are gullible. I include myself in that category.
Ireallylikethisshow
09-30-2006, 06:18 PM
Originally posted by RamonaE
Jimmy never called. I was so tired of everyone saying how nice of a guy Jimmy was supposed to be and how it was time that Chloe got a nice boyfriend....
Jimmy never called! LOL :p
I guess we'll have to see if he has a good reason or not... if they decide to follow up on that. S'pose we might never know.
RamonaE
10-01-2006, 09:35 AM
I think whatever reason he has, it won't matter. He's only signed on for 7 episodes. 1 down, 6 more to go.
He had the possibility of being signed on for as many as 10 but I haven't heard anything about that yet.
I am the Superman
10-01-2006, 02:00 PM
Who cares if jimmy didnt call chloe back? Seems to me both of them just wanted to get off, it was a mutual agreement.
Joe Bob
10-01-2006, 07:10 PM
Trust me, a girl who looses her virginity is probably not getting off. From what I hear from girls, losing one's virginity is not always the most pleasant experience. I'm sure Chloe wanted a little more out of the relationship than sex. And here's a clue bud, most girls want more than just sex. It's us guys who only want to screw. If you learn that you'll understand women better and you may get more women.
shuyin131
10-01-2006, 07:20 PM
I think I'll just forget the ignorance of the above post.
On topic, I thought Jimmy was cool. They set the beginning for Jimmy's character and how he idolizes Clark in the future. I liked that he called him CK before they left.
It was clear to me that Clark was jealous, and had some feelings for Chloe, but this situation wasnt like the other Lana ones (or even at one time, Lois) where he was actually concerned for their wellbeing.
About the joke, I think a lot of you read into that too deep. The simple fact that they smiled a each other, glad to see one another, and Chloe going out to lunch with him w/ no ill feelings shown is telling me that no he isnt/wasn't a jerk, and by the way Chloe acts, she gets all giddy around him.
RamonaE
10-01-2006, 07:37 PM
Why was Joe's post ignorant? Girls usually do want more than just sex. I don't think that poster before him was correct when he said that Chloe just wanted to get off? That's probably not true.
Ireallylikethisshow
10-01-2006, 07:39 PM
Ya'll... we don't even know what happened.
What if Chloe had broken up with Jimmy and Jimmy stopped being her friend because he was sad about it? And that's why he didn't call?
What if both broke up mutually, and Jimmy wasn't sure if they wanted to stay friends so he didn't call back, and thought she might be upset when she saw him again.
I don't think what he did was that bad or else Chloe wouldn't be hanging with him
shuyin131
10-01-2006, 07:54 PM
Originally posted by RamonaE
Why was Joe's post ignorant? Girls usually do want more than just sex. I don't think that poster before him was correct when he said that Chloe just wanted to get off? That's probably not true.
And here's a clue bud, most girls want more than just sex.
Using the word 'most' is completely wrong, and ignorant because first of all, he can't make the generalization and has no 'base' in which to prove that statement.
There's a lot of women out there that their sole purpose is sex. So really, no generalization can be made for any group of women. Even though you're a female, you can't speak for other females as each person has different wants.
It's us guys who only want to screw. If you learn that you'll understand women better and you may get more women.
Completely false, and generalized the male species for us. Not all males are like this, and its the same exact logic I just wrote about for females, but reverse it for males.
RamonaE
10-01-2006, 08:03 PM
Ok, as a woman, I can honestly say that most women are not interested in just "sex." That in no way applies to all women. As you said, there are all types of people in this world. But "most" doesn't mean "all."
But overall women usually want more out of a relationship than just sex. It's just the way it is. I'm in no way saying that there aren't exceptions to the rule b/c obviously there are.
But I can honestly say that overall most or at least a good portion (not all) of women are not wanting to just have sex (without some kind of relationship).
Ireallylikethisshow
10-01-2006, 08:06 PM
Chloe doesn't really seem like the kind of girl who would be okay with that-
But, it probably shouldn't have been immplied that all women want relationships and all men just want sex w/o maybe clarifying that you know not all ppl are like that...
but... like I said above, we don't know what happened with their relationship
RamonaE
10-01-2006, 08:08 PM
Originally posted by Ireallylikethisshow
Chloe doesn't really seem like the kind of girl who would be okay with that-
But, it probably shouldn't have been immplied that all women want relationships and all men just want sex w/o maybe clarifying that you know not all ppl are like that...
but... like I said above, we don't know what happened with their relationship
I didn't make the comment in absolutes. Joe Bob was the original poster he was referring to.
Ireallylikethisshow
10-01-2006, 08:09 PM
^ I know... you did not say it in absolutes. I'm sorry if you thought I was reffering to you.
RamonaE
10-01-2006, 08:17 PM
No problem.
shuyin131
10-01-2006, 08:20 PM
But overall women usually want more out of a relationship than just sex.
And men don't? That was a major issue I had w/ his post. It was made from a young persons perspective, while it seems true at a young age, its not so true in 'the real world'
RamonaE
10-01-2006, 08:22 PM
Oh, I don't think that most men only want sex either. I think most people in general are looking for something other than just screwing. That's my opinion.
I am the Superman
10-01-2006, 08:51 PM
-And here's a clue bud, most girls want more than just sex.
Using the word 'most' is completely wrong, and ignorant because first of all, he can't make the generalization and has no 'base' in which to prove that statement.
There's a lot of women out there that their sole purpose is sex. So really, no generalization can be made for any group of women. Even though you're a female, you can't speak for other females as each person has different wants.
It's us guys who only want to screw. If you learn that you'll understand women better and you may get more women.
Completely false, and generalized the male species for us. Not all males are like this, and its the same exact logic I just wrote about for females, but reverse it for males.-
Whats wrong with generalizations?
Also, Id just like to say, regardless of a mans moral values, his sexual desires are very powerful. Immensily more powerful then those of a woman. So, given that, it is safe to say, most men, just want to have sex.
Im not neccesarily like that, I can control myself, its hard, but I do it.
RamonaE
10-02-2006, 04:45 PM
Originally posted by I am the Superman
Whats wrong with generalizations?
Also, Id just like to say, regardless of a mans moral values, his sexual desires are very powerful. Immensily more powerful then those of a woman. So, given that, it is safe to say, most men, just want to have sex.
Im not neccesarily like that, I can control myself, its hard, but I do it.
too funny. :)
gj430
10-02-2006, 05:09 PM
I like to have more in a relationship than just sex. But I also wouldn't mind just having a sex relationship if it weren't for stds. I'm to afraid to just go out and have sex with some girl I don't even know. Even if your protected you could get something. If your in a more serious thing you can kind of make sure they have been tested and stuff even though thats got to be an akward conversation.
Think about if it weren't for stds couldn't we just go around and have sex with as many people as we could what would there be to stop us. Isn't the stigma against sleeping around really boiled down to that. If there was no risk what would be the difference between being with 2 people or 100.
Here's my problem I was in a long term relationship now I'm at school and haven't dated for a awhile if I want to get into something with someone and sleep with them I'm afraid I might get something so what do you do. I want to have sex it feels good and alot of people enjoy it, but on the other I'm afraid I'll do that and then end up getting something. because it could happen after one person or 10 or whatever so how do you ever really know if you can or not if you are just meeting someone you don't know very well. Like at a bar or a dating site. It's kind of a hard decision because I don't really have the money to be in a long term relationship right and would like to have sex but am just afraid of what might happen. Anyway, aside from all that, when it comes to a longtermrelationship I'm all for it being about more than sex. I like the romance and friendship, but sex is an important part of a relationshipt also, it's a good way to make each other feel good and if you know your both safe you can do it alot more than if you were just several partners a few times and worried about getting something.
shirkie
10-02-2006, 05:10 PM
OK this thread has gone wayyyyyyy out there. Stick to talking about whether or not Jimmy is a jerk.
shirkie
RamonaE
10-02-2006, 05:14 PM
Yeah, I don't know how it ever got here?
gj430
10-02-2006, 05:27 PM
ok sorry
someone else was talking about how guys felt about sex and I kinda went on a rant I'm sorry I was just kinda puttin in my 2 cents.
when it comes to jimmy i'm not sure we know enough about what happened back in that summer to know if he is being a jerk.
here's some stuff we do know.
a. Jimmy said, "I hope this isnt because i didn't call you back." (Now I think it was said or written by the writers to just be a joke and be funny) but it can't be ignored, and we don't really know what happened if he did it in a jerk way or if they didn't see eye to eye at the time and he just didn't call back afterwards.
B. Chloe didn't sound upset about it in S4 just that her first time wasn't awful but not special. So her first time not neccassarily Jimmy in general. and we don't know if they only did it once or not.
C. Chloe wasn't upset when she saw him at the Planet in Zod, and actually looked kind of happy or amused that he was there.
D. then she said I can't belive you work here, like sahe was happy he does.
E. Right after turning down CLark she is immediately happy to see him when he calls her bright eyes and is more than willing to hangout with him and grab something to eat and start there friendship again and leading into dating.
So without knowing what happened when they were together before and judging from Chloe's reaction to him barring bad writing wich I don't think thats the case. I don't think he was too much a jerk about it. Though just from the comment he said I would say it's better than not to call her back and at least have some resolution and see where each other stands.
ginnyfan
10-02-2006, 06:31 PM
I don't think I'd be smiling at the jerk that took my virginity and didn't call me... the way Chloe was smiling whenever she was with Jimmy. LOL! And from the way Allison Mack describes thier relationship... I think Chimmy (Chlimmy?) is going to be great! Angst free! I mean really JIMMY? A player? I don't think so... LOL!
son2380
10-02-2006, 07:06 PM
Maybe if Chloe had a little more self respect for her self she wouldn't be so guilable and desparate for a man. Stop being so subservant to men
shirkie
10-02-2006, 07:34 PM
How has Chloe ever shown to be "desperate" or "gullible" or "subservient"? She fell for Justin Gaines in "Crush," Ian Randall in "Dichotic," her perpetual crush for Clark, and apparently she and Jimmy got together. That's no better than Lana falling for Ian Randall, Adam Knight, Seth ("Magnetic"), Jason Teague, Clark, and Lex...
We don't know anything about how well Chloe and Jimmy really knew each other or what the circumstances behind their intimate encounter was... We just know that Chloe wishes she would have waited.
shirkie
Joe Bob
10-02-2006, 08:29 PM
Originally posted by son2380
Maybe if Chloe had a little more self respect for her self she wouldn't be so guilable and desparate for a man. Stop being so subservant to men
I think the word you're looking for subservient? And no, Chloe is not subservient to men. She's an independent woman with her own goals and doesn't look for male approval. Just b/c she wants male companionship doesn't mean she's being subservient. If that was the case, then my girlfriend wouldn't rule the roost.
Nospam
10-02-2006, 08:57 PM
Originally posted by son2380
Maybe if Chloe had a little more self respect for her self she wouldn't be so guilable and desparate for a man. Stop being so subservant to men
Like others have said, she desired companionship and the only thing that makes her is human. Chloe has shown many times that despite how she feels about Clark, she will not sacrifice her convictions simply to allay his feelings. One of the best examples is in Drone when Chloe supports Paul as school president over Clark, notwithstanding her strong feelings for him.
I am the Superman
10-04-2006, 05:27 PM
-Maybe if Chloe had a little more self respect for her self she wouldn't be so guilable and desparate for a man. Stop being so subservant to men
-
Oh great, a femanist...
son2380
10-04-2006, 06:14 PM
Originally posted by shirkie
How has Chloe ever shown to be "desperate" or "gullible" or "subservient"? She fell for Justin Gaines in "Crush," Ian Randall in "Dichotic," her perpetual crush for Clark, and apparently she and Jimmy got together. That's no better than Lana falling for Ian Randall, Adam Knight, Seth ("Magnetic"), Jason Teague, Clark, and Lex...
We don't know anything about how well Chloe and Jimmy really knew each other or what the circumstances behind their intimate encounter was... We just know that Chloe wishes she would have waited.
shirkie
What does Lana have to do with Chloe Keeping her legs closed. I don't need to know how well Chloe and jimmy were before they met. Because Im not a Chloe worshipper so my judgement is not blinded by it
Originally posted by I am the Superman
-Maybe if Chloe had a little more self respect for her self she wouldn't be so guilable and desparate for a man. Stop being so subservant to men
-
Oh great, a femanist...
Im not a feminist Im a male chauvinist lol
RamonaE
10-04-2006, 06:45 PM
Originally posted by son2380
What does Lana have to do with Chloe Keeping her legs closed. I don't need to know how well Chloe and jimmy were before they met. Because Im not a Chloe worshipper so my judgement is not blinded by it
Im not a feminist Im a male chauvinist lol
I think "Chloe worshipper" is a little harsh. Chloe fan is more appropriate.
Secondly, you shouldn't be proud of being a male chauvinist. They have a three letter word for that, pig.
I am the Superman
10-04-2006, 08:31 PM
Edited out insult
RamonaE
10-04-2006, 09:39 PM
Edited out insult
You're awful :rolleyes:
Nospam
10-04-2006, 09:51 PM
Edited out insult
Wearing prejudice like a badge of honor is a pretty crass thing to do. Be confident in yourself, which costs others nothing, than attempt to take the dignity of others for yourself.
That's your fortune cookie message for the day.
I am the Superman
10-05-2006, 07:39 AM
-You're awful -
You know you love it.
shirkie
10-05-2006, 02:07 PM
Originally posted by son2380
What does Lana have to do with Chloe Keeping her legs closed. I don't need to know how well Chloe and jimmy were before they met. Because Im not a Chloe worshipper so my judgement is not blinded by it
The reason I brought up Lana is because Chloe's past behaviors are no more "subservient" or "desperate" than Lana's, the female lead of the show, so to label Chloe as such would mean to label Lana as such. I don't think that case can be made.
And guys, try to stay civil within the convo, my edit button is getting quite a workout in this thread!!
shirkie
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.