LastingChlarker
04-27-2006, 07:03 PM
In past episodes I never clamored for Chloe to be in danger. And I still don't. It'll happen when it happens and I'm sure it'll be well worth the wait.
BUT...That said, there was just something said tonight that felt like quite the oversight. Graham tells Clark that now he has to kill him, Lex and Lana because they know who he is and all the tralala...Did I miss something? Wasn't Graham right there listening while Clark and CHLOE were discussing his invisibility and such? Wouldn't it have made more sense if he'd also said he'd have to go after Chloe as well? I'm not saying show it on screen, but at least acknowledge the fact that he knew she knew too.
And for that I only blame the writers.
I fully understand that the whole point was for him to go after Lana and Lex...but if that line was to make any sense at all then it should have included the FOUR people that knew of his secret, not just three out of four...even if he'd never get to go after Chloe at all. It's just a matter of mentioning it IMO.
BUT...That said, there was just something said tonight that felt like quite the oversight. Graham tells Clark that now he has to kill him, Lex and Lana because they know who he is and all the tralala...Did I miss something? Wasn't Graham right there listening while Clark and CHLOE were discussing his invisibility and such? Wouldn't it have made more sense if he'd also said he'd have to go after Chloe as well? I'm not saying show it on screen, but at least acknowledge the fact that he knew she knew too.
And for that I only blame the writers.
I fully understand that the whole point was for him to go after Lana and Lex...but if that line was to make any sense at all then it should have included the FOUR people that knew of his secret, not just three out of four...even if he'd never get to go after Chloe at all. It's just a matter of mentioning it IMO.