PDA

View Full Version : The first real hint that Chloe will not become Lois



Billy Jor-El
10-20-2005, 10:18 PM
OK, those of us Chloe worshipers who have fantasized that ultimately Chloe would take on the pen name of Lois Lane (other than the one appearance at the Daily Planet....was that the "Perry" ep? I fergit). Well, with Clark consoling Lois that she would in fact meet someone with, well, super abilities, made me think she will become the true Lois of the DP.

And what of Chloe???? She dang well better have a future...I trust TPTB are listening??????

Hydra
10-20-2005, 10:23 PM
I trust they probably aren't. Regardless, it has always been assumed by a most people that Chloe was not Lois the second Lois made her first appearance on the show.

chlarklove
10-20-2005, 10:35 PM
Oh, okay.. I get it. So cheesy anvils mean more than actual development? Wow. How sucktastic is that?

Give me a break. Actions speak louder than words people, and guess what? No amount of words is gonna prove to me that she's the real deal when she's not DOING anything to further signify she is.

BlueNRed2
10-20-2005, 10:38 PM
To me, Chlois has always been a longshot possibility. One i would definately be thrilled about, if they actually went that direction.

I wouldnt rule it out completely based on the stuff in Aqua tho.

MBCorp
10-20-2005, 10:49 PM
Smallville loves cheesy anvils.:p

ma200
10-20-2005, 10:50 PM
Chlarklove, if chlark had those cheesy anvils, would you still react the same way or would you use them to support your chlois theory? Just curious.

DGreen
10-20-2005, 10:53 PM
i have several oppinions on this matter, but i think i'll post them on the theory's and speculations forum, seeing as how there's a thread for this already. u guys should probably do the same. the last thing we need is another clois thread. we should try to keep all of the ideas in one thread.

~*Lois & Clark Fan*~
10-20-2005, 10:56 PM
Originally posted by chlarklove
Oh, okay.. I get it. So cheesy anvils mean more than actual development? Wow. How sucktastic is that?

Give me a break. Actions speak louder than words people, and guess what? No amount of words is gonna prove to me that she's the real deal when she's not DOING anything to further signify she is.

WOW people are still buying into this theory? OMG no offense to anyone but how many cheesy anvils have to be dropped on people? ;)


How much is Clark DOING to signify that he'll be the future Superman? I guess people overlook that :rolleyes: I can't remember how many times the last few weeks people have said This Clark will never be our future Superman, but oh that's right I forgot Clark is allowed to not act like himself :rolleyes:

chlarklove
10-20-2005, 10:58 PM
Originally posted by ma200
Chlarklove, if chlark had those cheesy anvils, would you still react the same way or would you use them to support your chlois theory? Just curious.

I agree with DGreen, but I'm gonna answer you here.

Since Chloe has ALL the development of Lois, yes I would. Cause the actions back up the words.

However, if they weren't developing Chloe as Lois, then no. And there wouldn't even BE a theory now would there?

F-Stop Blues
10-20-2005, 11:02 PM
I dont think it makes a difference considering its apparent that chloe is going to die.

Chiriru
10-20-2005, 11:02 PM
Okay people, I don't know how hard this is to grasp:

EVERYTHING ABOUT CHLOIS BELONGS IN THE CHLOIS THREAD IN THE SPEC FORUM

Next one of these threads I find started, I AM warning the thread starter.

Closing this; you know where this discussion goes.