PDA

View Full Version : Man Fined $408 for Missing His Dog



Sharkie
02-15-2005, 02:38 PM
From the AJC:


Lee Wharton was looking for his dog.

He found a judge, instead.

Henry County Magistrate Court Judge Judy Hayes ordered Wharton earlier this month to pay a $300 fine, not including $108 in court fees, for violating the 2 1/2-year-old county sign ordinance.

Wharton's crime: He put lost-dog signs on utility poles. And when he found out the signs were illegal, he refused to take them down.

Wharton, 25, moved to Henry County about a year ago and said he didn't know the rules. He thinks the penalty was excessive and that the judge and code enforcement officers were insensitive to his plight.

"The issue isn't really the fine. It's the principle," Wharton says. "They should have been more lenient."

That makes the judge growl. Hayes says she could have slapped Wharton with a $500 fine. Fewer than 10 people have been convicted of violating the ordinance, designed to control business signs, and all got the maximum fine, the judge said. This was the first case of a lost-dog sign.

"I did feel sorry for him," Hayes said. "He lost his dog."

The dog in question, Kino, is a mixed labrador and American bulldog that Wharton got about two years ago. "He was like a child to me," said Wharton, an appraiser for the Clayton County government.

In mid-December, Kino ran away. Wharton began his search.

If he'd put up "stake signs" on private property, he would have been in the clear, according to the county code enforcement department. But Wharton put about 400 fliers describing the lost canine on stop signs, mailboxes and utility poles, Hayes said.

Jeremy Gilbert, the county code enforcement officer, told Wharton that signs on utility poles are a no-no and that he should take down any other signs.

That didn't happen. Gilbert gave Wharton a written warning.

Wharton, Gilbert said, told the officer to take down the signs himself.

"I wanted to find my dog," Wharton explained in an interview. "I felt the code enforcement officer should have been using his time more responsibly instead of hassling me about a lost-dog sign."

Wharton went to court. He pleaded not guilty but was convicted by Hayes. Wharton paid the $408 fine. In Gwinnett County, the maximum fine could have been $1,000; in Cobb County, $300.

Meanwhile, Wharton still is searching for Kino.

But he's not putting up any more signs.

katieishere
02-15-2005, 02:56 PM
:rotfl:

What an article.

This was probably an obscure law that not many people knew about. Also, he was looking for his dog. I feel bad for the guy.

However, since
1. the guy was given an alternative to putting signs on utility poles,
2. recieved a warning first, and then
3. given another opportunity to repost the signs in a way that didn't break any rules,
I feel he deserved the punishment.

For some reason, this guy has a chip on his shoulder about the signs. C'mon. Just repost them on lawn markers!

Disco
02-15-2005, 03:24 PM
I can understand not putting flyers on stop signs and peoples mailboxes. Didn't know that you can be fined for putting a sign up on a utility pole. What if you live in an area with few trees??

Unbreakable Lex
02-15-2005, 03:35 PM
If one person does, the neighborhood does it.

I say good for the judge. He broke the law.

Summers
02-15-2005, 03:55 PM
Mailboxes I understand, but poles? In my neighborhood there are flyers on the poles that are looking for doggies, cats, and having yard sales.

VersesBatman
02-15-2005, 04:06 PM
I felt bad for him up until the point where he refused to take them down after he was warned. Whether he liked them or not, rules are rules.

Sharkie
02-15-2005, 04:19 PM
Originally posted by Disco
I can understand not putting flyers on stop signs and peoples mailboxes. Didn't know that you can be fined for putting a sign up on a utility pole. What if you live in an area with few trees?? Well, it's a county ordinance. I'm not from Henry county so I don't no for certain, but I assume it's a rural county, since it's on the outskirts of Atlanta.

Personally, I think it could have been handled better, by both parties. No need for an issue over a dog to be taken to court.

Maniac in the Porsche
02-15-2005, 07:41 PM
Wharton's crime: He put lost-dog signs on utility poles. And when he found out the signs were illegal, he refused to take them down.

The reason for the rule is probably for safety for utility workers, among other things. When people staple and nail things to wooden telephone poles, the staples and nails can rip the legs of workers climbing the poles.

It's called an ad in the paper people.

j03superbat
11-09-2009, 08:22 PM
Oh, hey, that's close to where I live.

I didn't realize it until I was halfway done with reading the article. :lol:

----- Added 33 Seconds later -----


Well, it's a county ordinance. I'm not from Henry county so I don't no for certain, but I assume it's a rural county, since it's on the outskirts of Atlanta.
It's suburban.