PDA

View Full Version : Uhm how exactly did chloe teach clark to never give up on someone?



Night_Hawk90
05-08-2009, 09:35 AM
So according to clark chloe is the one who taught him to never give up on someone, yet she is the same person who has told him to kill lex, and doomsday?

mr lane
05-08-2009, 09:39 AM
So according to clark chloe is the one who taught him to never give up on someone, yet she is the same person who has told him to kill lex, and doomsday?

yeah i discussed that with a friend after last week's episode

she was also the one to kill sebastian without giving him another chance

i dont care how much she says brainiac was controling her we know different

Superman of Krypton
05-08-2009, 09:39 AM
She also told Clark to stop being the Redblue Blur and quit the Daily Planet...

Davis Bloome
05-08-2009, 09:41 AM
I wonder if there were more times that a fake Chloe went to talk to Clark or did she just show up during her absence...

costas22
05-08-2009, 09:41 AM
Well we don't know what was the case with Sebastian because it was never clarified. Nonetheless, that line was totaly false because as it has been mentioned, she did tell him to take care of Lex.

myankskent
05-08-2009, 09:49 AM
I think that Clark was referring to "Beast" when Chloe told Clark not to give up on Davis. Of course, past events show that Chloe has given up on people, even Clark, but TPTB tend to forget these kinds of things.

mr lane
05-08-2009, 09:52 AM
I think that Clark was referring to "Beast" when Chloe told Clark not to give up on Davis. Of course, past events show that Chloe has given up on people, even Clark, but TPTB tend to forget things these kinds of things.

agreed

i wish clark would give himself more credit, hes always been the one to never give up on anyone he doesnt need chloe or anyone to remind him or show him

prodigykane
05-08-2009, 10:03 AM
I didn't even think abou that. Too true

BadToad
05-08-2009, 10:06 AM
Clark has shown that he doesn't give up in people WAY before now, including in relation to Chloe. That was an unnecessary line, IMO, and I HATE when the show does that to Clark. As though these qualities are not inherently his, and he needs to thank someone else for them. But Chloe is "The Lana" right now, so I wouldn't be totally surprised if Clark thanks Chloe for his ability to feed and dress himself in the next episode.

Smallville Vamp
05-08-2009, 10:11 AM
Clark gave up on Oliver fairly quickly. I'm not sure Chloe has really taught Clark much of anything especially how to never give up on someone.

Chloe seems to be more of a do as I say(not do as I do) type of personality! Can't wait for Clark to find out Chloe killed a man. See what lessons he learns from that. Maybe some good will come out of this, who knows. :p

costas22
05-08-2009, 10:22 AM
I think this line must have been a reflection of the Chloe Sullivan we have come to know in the last 8 years. Of course there have been instances(with Lex in Quest) when she has given up on someone but those are the exceptions. In the early seasons of Smallville, she was the one who was willing to give a FOTW the benefit of the doubt while Lana or later on Jimmy were discarding them. And she did run ISIS for a while. So we could say that she has been known of giving second chances quite few times. The problem is that she never taught Clark that. The only people that Clark can say this for, are Jonathan and Martha.

smallvillereporter27
05-08-2009, 11:02 AM
I think this line must have been a reflection of the Chloe Sullivan we have come to know in the last 8 years. Of course there have been instances(with Lex in Quest) when she has given up on someone but those are the exceptions. In the early seasons of Smallville, she was the one who was willing to give a FOTW the benefit of the doubt while Lana or later on Jimmy were discarding them. And she did run ISIS for a while. So we could say that she has been known of giving second chances quite few times. The problem is that she never taught Clark that. The only people that Clark can say this for, are Jonathan and Martha.

ITA. The only time Chloe advocated to Clark about second chances was last week in Beast. Maybe that's what he's refering to, but still, the credit shouldn't go to Chloe. Clark should have some of these ideas all on his own :\

Iluvgreen
05-08-2009, 11:04 AM
She didn't tell him to kill Doomsday. She told him to save him.

Rift
05-08-2009, 12:26 PM
I dunno--she gave up on Jimmy pretty fast. ;)

redRound
05-08-2009, 12:37 PM
From day one Chloe had an attitude against Lex for no good reason, she never gave him a fair chance, even after he saved her life. And then towards the end, she was pushing Clark to kill him.

The writers are such revisionists.

AgentChaos
05-08-2009, 04:09 PM
From day one Chloe had an attitude against Lex for no good reason, she never gave him a fair chance, even after he saved her life. And then towards the end, she was pushing Clark to kill him.

The writers are such revisionists.

I have to disagree. She wasn't ever going to trust him 100%, but for the first 3 1/3 seasons, Chloe didn't have a problem with him. They even worked together most of Season 3 to bring Lionel to justice. Her distrust of Lex started after Scare, when, because of an experiment of Lex's that went wrong, she was faced with what was at the time her worst nightmare- ending up in a mental institution like her mother.

Between that and the end of Quest, when Chloe insinuated that Clark might have to take Lex out, Lex had kidnapped her and her mother, corrupted Lana (that one is debatable, but from Chloe's POV, he did), and stolen her dream job away from her. Not to mention the threat he represented to Clark.

cygnusx1
05-08-2009, 04:23 PM
I dunno--she gave up on Jimmy pretty fast. ;)

so true, but i'm sure chloe wasn't referring to herself only clark

chlo-el
05-09-2009, 12:25 PM
Well Chloesaid that Clark taught her that to her but he seemed to give up on that in "Beast" so she just reminded him of his original beleif.

Bizarrolover
05-09-2009, 01:01 PM
She didn't tell him to kill Doomsday. She told him to save him.


That's in eternal or Beast? because in eternal she killed Davis herself and told clark, when he said that there is always another way, that he never took care of the things that threatened him because of his code of ethics.

pen2paper
05-09-2009, 01:18 PM
I think he's reffering to Beast, but ye I agree that martha and Jonathan were the ones that truly tought him that.


That's in eternal or Beast? because in eternal she killed Davis herself and told clark, when he said that there is always another way, that he never took care of the things that threatened him because of his code of ethics.

And with eternal, she made that decision because she saw no other way. DD gets out and theres not much of an option, but at the end of eternal she finds a way to save them both. Even if thats not how it will end up.

Clark prolly doesnt realise that he's the one that doesnt give up on people, he gives credit it all the other people in his life because they helped mould him into the person he is, and recently that person has been chloe.